There is only one part of President Trump’s agenda with real opportunity for a big win, right now, and that … Continue reading Future of American Infrastructure Hinges on Paris Agreement
Submission from Citizens’ Climate Education on ways to enhance participation of non-Party stakeholders in the implementation of the UN Framework Convention on … Continue reading UNFCCC Stakeholder Participation Reform Proposal
The following essay is based on my intervention at the CNDH Maroc Special Event on Human Rights and Climate Change, held … Continue reading Climate Solvency: Human Rights as Drivers of Future Thriving
We’re entering a new age for the Earth’s climate and for the way we conceive of finance “Macrocritical resilience” may … Continue reading Finance for Deep-Rooted Prosperity is Coming
- Presented: August 10, 2016 — 6:00 pm – 7:30 pm
In the Paris Agreement, 195 nations acknowledge “that climate change is a common concern of humankind,” and agree to “respect, promote and consider their respective obligations on … intergenerational equity.” Intergenerational equity refers to the ethical principle that we should not discount the cost of harm when it falls on future generations. A number of other broad, basic, and also pragmatic ethical principles accompany intergenerational equity as the foundation for both national and international climate action, but it is necessary to take a moment and absorb the significance of this particular element of the world’s first universal agreement on climate action. That intergenerational equity should be a principle guiding how governments plan for and respond to climate disruption suggests a new baseline for international law: actions that project harm and degradation into the future must be avoided.
The ACCESS to GOOD Project is an open, collaborative, ongoing reporting process, aiming to identify observable levers of action for adding value, momentum, and scope to investments in climate action and resilient human development.
ACCESS is a framework for analyzing the level of progress on comprehensive climate action. The axis standard aims to measure six qualifications of public policy, investment prioritization and business action:
GOOD is a framework for analyzing the generative tendencies, inclucing community-building reinforcements and local value added of day to day economic activity, at the human scale. This analysis operates on the premise that all economic behavior has at its roots a basic and specific demand for generative optimizing capabilities operating organically through routine human behavior.
The following is the content of a Citizens’ Climate University lesson delivered Thursday, February 4, 2016, on the Paris Agreement, Citizens’ Climate Lobby’s organizing to support a strong outcome at COP21, the ongoing work of the Citizens’ Climate Engagement Network, and how all of this translates into citizen policy action in the United States.
The lesson is broken into four sections:
- How the UNFCCC Process Works
- CCL’s Paris Ground Game
- How the Paris Agreement Mobilizes Action
- What does that mean for CCL and the US?
For the first 12 days of December, our team was on the ground in Paris for the COP21, engaging with peers, meeting with negotiators, publishing reports, interviewing participants, and working to support coalition efforts that would add smarter policies, actionable language and serious principles, to the Paris Agreement. During more than a year of planning for this work and defining our goals, I had the privilege of discussing on various occasions with senior diplomats how the Paris climate talks could serve as an irreversible expansion of the civic space. Paris could mark a new step forward in the work of building democratic processes around the world.
It is the next to last day of the COP21, according to the official schedule. The French presidency of the … Continue reading ACCESS to the Future